Survey · Hand-Object Interaction · Embodied Intelligence

Hand-Object Interaction in the Age of Large Foundation Models:
Reconstruction, Generation, and Embodied Transfer

1Xidian University   2Zhongguancun Academy   3Microsoft Research Asia   4Peking University   5Visincept
6
HOI Tasks
3
Prior Families
8
Foundation-Model Sub-Priors
17
Prior–Task Combinations
3
Embodied Transfer Directions
200+
Methods Surveyed
20
Human-Video Datasets
34
HOI Benchmark Datasets
6
Open Challenges

Abstract

Hand-object interaction (HOI) modeling remains challenging because it requires joint reasoning about hand articulation, object geometry, contact, semantics, and dynamics under severe visual uncertainty. Foundation models introduce transferable prior knowledge learned from large-scale cross-domain data, offering new ways to address these challenges beyond task-specific data and models. However, the rapidly growing literature remains fragmented, and existing studies typically describe these methods simply as “using large models” without systematically characterizing what knowledge is introduced, where it enters the HOI pipeline, or which HOI uncertainty it helps reduce. This survey presents the first systematic review of foundation-model priors for HOI. We organize the literature into six HOI tasks spanning reconstruction and generation. More importantly, we establish a taxonomy of eight foundation-model sub-priors grouped into geometric, semantic, and visual families. Geometric priors encompass shape retrieval, shape reconstruction, and spatial reconstruction; semantic priors include semantic grounding and language reasoning; and visual priors cover visual representation, image generation, and video generation. Based on this taxonomy, we systematically analyze how different priors are represented, injected, and adapted across HOI pipelines and tasks. Beyond how foundation models empower HOI, we further examine how HOI-derived knowledge is used in robot learning, including human-data pretraining, human-to-robot skill transfer, and HOI-to-robot data generation. Finally, we summarize datasets and evaluation protocols, and discuss limitations and future directions toward more generalizable HOI systems. To support long-term progress, we curate a live repository that continuously aggregates emerging methods and benchmarks.

Teaser overview
Overview of this survey. Six HOI tasks (reconstruction and generation) are supported by eight foundation-model sub-priors in three families: geometric (shape retrieval, shape reconstruction, spatial reconstruction), semantic (semantic grounding, language reasoning), and visual (visual representation, image generation, video generation). The resulting HOI knowledge further enables embodied transfer through human-data pretraining, human-to-robot skill transfer, and HOI-to-robot data generation.

Key Contributions

TAXONOMY

Prior-Driven Knowledge Taxonomy

The first unified framework that organizes HOI methods by the type of foundation-model prior they inject, covering eight sub-priors under geometric, semantic, and visual families rather than by task or architecture alone, and revealing what cross-domain knowledge is introduced and which uncertainty it reduces.

ANALYSIS

Prior Injection Mechanisms

A systematic decomposition of how priors enter the HOI pipeline through asset retrieval, shape initialization and regularization, scale alignment and registration, token fusion, region conditioning, interaction-semantic conditioning, adapter/ControlNet conditioning, and score-guided regularization, while tracing the source, injected representation, and residual limitation of each.

TRANSFER

HOI-to-Robot Embodied Transfer

A bridge from visual HOI analysis to embodied intelligence, organizing how human hand-object evidence flows into robot learning through human-data pretraining, human-to-robot skill transfer, and HOI-to-robot data engines.

Taxonomy Roadmap

The roadmap below maps the eight foundation-model sub-priors across three families to the six HOI reconstruction and generation tasks reviewed in each subsection. It serves as a navigational guide: for any task, it indicates which prior family and sub-prior sections to consult, and for any prior, it shows which tasks it supports.

Taxonomy roadmap
Taxonomy roadmap: three prior families decomposed into eight sub-priors and linked to HOI reconstruction and generation tasks.

A Taxonomy of Foundation-Model Priors

We organize foundation-model knowledge into three families—geometric, semantic, and visual—with eight sub-priors that each address a distinct class of HOI uncertainty. These priors do not redefine the HOI task; they inject cross-domain knowledge at different stages of a shared hand-object pipeline.

GEOMETRIC PRIORS

Shape Retrieval · Shape Reconstruction · Spatial Reconstruction

Reduce shape and spatial uncertainty via asset retrieval from 3D libraries, single-image-to-3D generation for occluded geometry, and monocular spatial reconstruction (depth, point maps, camera alignment).

Geometric priors injection
SEMANTIC PRIORS

Semantic Grounding · Language Reasoning

Localize functional regions and infer interaction intent through open-vocabulary grounding and language reasoning, distinguishing visually similar but functionally different manipulations.

Semantic priors injection
VISUAL PRIORS

Visual Representation · Image Generation · Video Generation

Transfer reusable visual features and model distributions over appearance, temporal coherence, and interaction dynamics via general-purpose visual encoders and pretrained image/video generators, extending toward action-conditioned HOI world models.

Visual priors injection
Residual uncertainties and interventions
Residual HOI uncertainties left by conventional components and the corresponding foundation-prior interventions.

From HOI to Embodied Intelligence

Beyond reconstruction and generation, we examine how HOI-derived knowledge transfers to robot learning along three directions: human-data pretraining, human-to-robot skill transfer, and HOI-to-robot data engines. These directions further specialize into five concrete transfer routes for supervision, target-skill guidance, and reusable robot training data.

Embodied transfer routes
Five routes by which HOI evidence becomes robot-learning supervision, target-skill guidance, or reusable robot training data.

Open Challenges & Future Directions

01

Toward Integrated and Verifiable HOI Foundation Systems

No single prior family suffices. A modular system around a shared hand-object state, contact, and trajectory interface, where priors are composed by dominant uncertainty and validated through contact/physics or robot execution.

02

From Geometric Correctness to Interaction Correctness

Current benchmarks are dominated by geometric metrics. Future evaluation should integrate contact agreement, functional success, physical plausibility, and object-state transition fidelity under a common protocol.

03

Long-Horizon, Dynamic-Camera, World-Space HOI

Jointly recovering camera ego-motion, long-horizon hand-object state, and contact in a unified world frame across grasp, manipulation, release, and re-grasp phases remains open.

04

Prior Reliability, Routing, and Conflict Resolution

Estimate prior confidence, route priors by occlusion, visibility, camera motion, and intent, and expose conflicts rather than silently averaging incompatible signals.

05

From HOI Analysis to Dynamic Embodied Memory

Store HOI-derived variables in a queryable dynamic memory that persists across occluded manipulation phases and reconciles pre-grasp estimates with subsequent interaction evidence.

06

Robot-Centric Understanding of Human HOI

Infer richer, robot-usable descriptions of human HOI, including object/part identity, interaction phase, contact, intent, and intended object-state change, beyond raw trajectory transfer.

BibTeX

@article{lin2026hoi,
  title   = {Hand-Object Interaction in the Age of Large Foundation Models: Reconstruction, Generation, and Embodied Transfer},
  author  = {Weiquan Lin and Yu Deng and Shiyang Liu and Luping Xiao and Xu Tang and Junzhi Yu and Jiaolong Yang and Lei Zhang and Xingyu Chen},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.17354},
  year    = {2026}
}